Tag Archives: uk politics

More Birkbeckians than Etonians in the new government

Matt Innes is Birkbeck’s Academic and Corporate Deputy Vice-Chancellor, as well Professor of History in Birkbeck’s School of Historical Studies. Here, he reflects on the reach and impact of Birkbeck alumni.

The 2024 election saw a record number of Birkbeck graduates in the new Parliament, with a total of fourteen Birkbeck alumni and Fellows elected. Now that the final ministerial appointments have been announced, Birkbeck can count no fewer than seven alumni and fellows holding government office. These number three cabinet ministers, two ministers of state and a number of other appointments.

The total surpasses the four Birkbeck figures who took up office one hundred years ago, when the first Labour government was formed just a few years after the extension of the vote to all adult males and some women. In that hundred years, Birkbeck figures have played significant roles in a number of governments. Birkbeck is one of the few Universities whose history includes a head of institution who went on to hold ministerial office: Baroness Tessa Blackstone.

The demographic and educational background of new ministers in 2024, and the extent to which it signals a change in the established pattern of UK political life, has attracted analysis and comment. Bridget Phillipson, the new Secretary of State for Education, has spoken about the importance of social class and obstacles to educational success for many of the new Cabinet: although all bar one Cabinet members are graduates, most were the first in their family to be able to attend University, often overcoming significant barriers to do so.

Research by the Sutton Trust has shown that over 90% of the new Cabinet were educated in state secondary schools, in a sharp change even with previous Labour Cabinets (which were typically a third privately educated), and still more dramatic contrast with preceding Conservative governments (often over two thirds privately educated). Over a quarter of the new Cabinet have law qualifications, with politics and history being other popular degree subjects, including three Oxford Philosophy, Politics and Economics graduates and two Cambridge historians.

Of the 17 Prime Ministers who have held office since Winston Churchill in the Second World War, no fewer than thirteen took their undergraduate degree at Oxford (the exceptions being three ‘takeover’ Prime Ministers who came to office mid-Parliament after their predecessors stood down, rather than via the Ballot Box:  James Callaghan, John Major and Gordon Brown.

Sir Keir Starmer’s undergraduate degree from Leeds University brings the number of UK Universities with Prime Ministerial alumni to six; Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Glasgow and – of course – Birkbeck, where Ramsay MacDonald, the first working class Prime Minister, took evening classes in science.

In 1924, the Birkbeck presence in government reflected the university’s position as the institution of choice for education hungry Londoners without the means to access the traditional universities. It exemplified a broader process of change: namely the integration of the institutions and organisations of working-class self-advancement into the formal public life of the nation.

In 2024, Birkbeck’s presence again reflects a broader process of change, as a generation who benefitted from the extension of educational opportunity and university access in the late twentieth century come into office. All seven Birkbeck educated ministers undertook postgraduate or professional studies, with the distinction and flexibility for which Birkbeck is known, providing an educational bridge into professional and political careers. Four of them took Birkbeck’s prestigious politics and government portfolio, which remains popular amongst recent graduates seeking to make their way in the world of policy and politics.

Educational opportunity is one of the new Government’s five core missions, and the crisis ridden state of UK universities is a matter of urgent debate. The personal histories of so many Birkbeck graduates speak to the opportunity created by Birkbeck’s distinctive educational model and the personal and professional growth it fosters. With the university accelerating strategic changes which will deliver even greater accessibility and flexibility, Birkbeck can offer a compelling alternative to traditional university that is keenly relevant to the Government’s mission.

Note: 

Birkbeck alumni and Fellows in the Starmer government include: (Cabinet) David Lammy MP, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Lisa Nandy MP, Secretary of State for Culture Media & Sport; Lou Haigh MP, Secretary of State for Transport. (Ministers) Tulip Siddiq MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury & City Minister; Georgia Gould MP, Minister of State in the Cabinet Office; Alison McGovern MP, Minister of State in the Department of Work & Pensions; Hamish Falconer MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Baroness (Fiona) Twycross, Baroness in Waiting (Government Whip).

More information:

Share

From shades of Gray to a confidence vote: three things we know about Boris Johnson

Yesterday saw UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson narrowly surviving a vote of confidence by Conservative MPs. Senior Lecturer in Politics, Dr Ben Worthy analyses the findings of the Sue Gray Report and gives his predictions for the future of Boris Johnson in Downing Street.  

There were parties  

The Gray report finally confirms that regular parties were held in Downing Street. This is simple but important. They weren’t accidental, or ‘cake ambushes’ taking the poor PM by surprise. Police investigated a total of twelve parties, with a further four left uninvestigated. The parties were organised, premeditated, and put together in advance, while the rest of the UK was in severe lockdown so stringent that funerals couldn’t be held, and relatives couldn’t visit loved ones in hospital. As the report put it bluntly: ‘It is important to remember the stringency of the public health regulations in force in England over the relevant periods and that criminal sanctions were applied to many found to be in breach of them’. What was fine for Downing Street, resulted in a fine for others.   

It shouldn’t need saying, of course. But the truth is important. Most Prime Ministers, and most politicians, are ‘economical with the truth’. But more than most, Prime Minister Johnson’s career has been built on what Nixon called ‘things that later turned out to be untrue’, from the £350 million promises written on a bus to the denial of lockdown parties. The first question on his recent Mumsnet interview was “Why should we believe anything you say when it’s been proven you’re a habitual liar?” A website has collated more examples of lies from Boris Johnson. Even his biography of Churchill was littered with ‘misunderstandings’, including that the Germans captured Stalingrad 

Amid the fog of untruth and evasions, the report sets out what happened, when and where, with photos and evidence.  Surprisingly, or unsurprisingly depending on how cynical you are, allegations of more parties have emerged since the report. As Marina Hyde, Guardian columnist, always points out, with Boris Johnson there’s always more.   

They knew they were wrong  

One of the more astonishing parts of the report is how much of the wrongdoing was recorded. What was written showed that many participating knew it was wrong. Again, there were no accidental parties but instead, instructions to ‘bring your own booze’. The report shows that someone close to the Prime Minister, warned fellow party goers:  

‘Just to flag that the press conference will probably be finishing around that time, so it would be helpful if people can be mindful of that as speakers and cameras are leaving, not walking around waving bottles of wine etc.’  

The individual went on to write: ‘Best of luck with a complete nonstory but better than them focusing on our drinks (which we seem to have got away with).’  

Perhaps the hardest parts of the report are the details of the treatment received by those who pointed out what they were doing was wrong. In the report, Gray writes: ‘I was made aware of multiple examples of a lack of respect and poor treatment of security and cleaning staff. This was unacceptable.’ Though there are no details, The Sun has reported how one security guard was mocked for pointing it out and cleaners were laughed at as they cleared up the mess. One image that stands out, is of staff, the days after the many nights before, scrubbing post-party wine stains after travelling across lockdown London.   

Conservative MPs are not happy  

If Conservative MPs were surprised by the Gray report, many were silent for some time after. In the 24 hours after its release, many thought that no news was good news, and a sign that Johnson was out of trouble. But we now know the quiet was more ominous, with MPs weighing up options. In the following days there was a steady uptick in letters to the 1922 committee which triggered a vote of confidence.  

Some Conservative MPs were genuinely outraged. Paul Holmes, who resigned from the government, spoke of his ‘distress’ at a ‘toxic culture’ in Downing Street. Others, depending on your view, may be more cunning or realistic; even before Partygate, Johnson had slowly become an electoral liability. He is now a vote loser not a vote winner.    

Already nervous Conservative MPs know that, because of the Gray report, every leaflet from a Labour, Liberal Democrat or Green opponent will feature a photo of Boris Johnson drinking, which they will have to defend or distance themselves from. This is at a time when a full 59% of the public believe he should resign (though not many think he will). One analyst has worked out that ten recent letter submitters are in vulnerable seats at greatest risk to the Lib Dems. Over in Wakefield, where there is a by-election this month, Labour are twenty points ahead, with the main reason for voters switching, according to one pollster, is ‘Boris Johnson tried to cover up partygate, and lied to the public’.  

Boris Johnson still isn’t safe  

On Monday 6 June, Johnson finally faced a confidence vote which he won but, it must be said, won badly, with 40% of his own MPs voting to remove him. More Conservative MPs voted against him than voted against Theresa May in 2018, and she lasted only a few more months in power afterwards. This leaves his leadership in the worst possible position, still in post but with almost half of his own party against him.   

Boris Johnson is now in very serious trouble, and his time in Downing Street can probably be measured in months, if not weeks. His MPs, his party and the public are deeply unhappy. The details and images from the report may mark the end of Johnson’s time in Downing Street. Whatever happens next, the Sue Gray report will be a defining document of Johnson’s premiership, and a symbol of what went wrong.     

Ben Worthy is the Director of the MSc in Government, Policy and Politics at Birkbeck. 

More information  

 

Share