Tag Archives: Journal of Management Studies

Department of Management Meets the Editor: Professor Jonathan Doh

Researchers aspiring to publish in Journal of Management Studies joined Birkbeck’s Department of Management for an hour with General Editor Professor Jonathan Doh.

Birkbeck’s Department of Management was delighted to welcome Professor Jonathan Doh for the seventh event in our Meet the Editor series on Monday 14 February 2022.

The seminar was chaired by Dr Muthu De Silva, Assistant Dean for Research in Birkbeck’s School of Business, Economics and Informatics, who welcomed colleagues from all over the world to the online session.

Professor Doh is General Editor of the Journal of Management Studies and was Editor in Chief of the Journal of World Business from 2014-18. He is Associate Dean of Research and Global Engagement, Rammrath Chair in International Business, Co-Faculty Director of the Center for Global Leadership, and Professor of Management at the Villanova School of Business. With over 130 publications and 18,000 Google Scholar citations to his name, Professor Doh brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to our Meet the Editor series.

Introduction to the Journal of Management Studies

The Journal of Management Studies (JMS) is a consistently highly ranked, multidisciplinary journal with a long-established history of excellence in management research. It has a 5-year Impact Factor of 10.960 and has been on the FT 50 list since 2010.

JMS has three General Editors and nine Associate Editors based across Europe, Asia and North America and has an Editorial Review Board of over 200 academics.

While JMS is a general management journal, there are several factors that set it apart from other journals in the field:

  • JMS considers itself to be especially pluralistic, with a range of different contributions from different places. The journal is open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical underpinnings.
  • JMS Editors have a fixed term of office and cannot publish in JMS, aside from Editorials and Introductions to commissioned content.
  • JMS Editors consult another member of the editorial team in the advanced stages of revision to ensure consistency in the decision-making process.
  • JMS has a dedicated Editorial Office team to assist with any issues or queries regarding paper submissions.

Why become a reviewer?

Professor Doh encouraged members of the audience, particularly early career researchers, to consider volunteering as a reviewer. For many Editors, becoming a reviewer is the first step in their editorial journey. Reviewing improves scholarly skills and is an opportunity to give back to the academic community. Those interested in becoming a reviewer for JMS can apply via Scholar One.

What are the publication criteria for the Journal of Management Studies?

JMS publishes innovative empirical and conceptual articles which advance knowledge of management and organisation. Professor Doh stressed that editors are particularly interested in unusual, surprising or challenging papers with a strong theoretical orientation.

Common reasons for rejection include lack of clear contribution, lack of methodological rigour or a clear and appropriate theoretical framework and lack of clear implications for management theory and practice.

In 2021, submissions to JMS reached an all-time high of 1,260. The majority of submissions come from Europe and Asia, with North America being the next highest contributor.

What is the review process for the Journal of Management Studies?

JMS operates a double-blind peer review process. Papers that go out for review typically receive three reviews drawn from the JMS Editorial Board as well as ad hoc reviewers and they aim to provide a decision within three months. Any paper that is to go out for review is screened for overlap with previous papers using the iThenticate software.

Typically, manuscripts will be revised two to four times before acceptance. Time from acceptance to appearing in print is approximately one year.

The desk rejection rate for JMS currently stands at 66% and the rejection rate after the first round of reviews is 26%. The acceptance rate is around 3%, however Professor Doh encouraged researchers to view this in the context of a vast increase in submissions year on year.

What types of articles does the Journal of Management Studies publish?

While the bulk of JMS publications are regular articles, Professor Doh highlighted the value in review articles. This could be particularly relevant for PhD students, who will have conducted a literature review as part of their thesis. In particular, JMS looks for literature review articles that add value in terms of theory contribution by situating and critiquing the literature, identifying any gaps and suggesting new avenues for research. JMS also considers meta-analyses as review articles.

The journal also publishes short essays, ‘JMS Says’, intended to catalyse new thinking and ‘point-counterpoints’ articles, which put forward a position or argument paired with one or more other articles proposing alternative arguments or perspectives. Essays are considered on an ad hoc basis. Professor Doh reflected on the merits of collaborations between junior and senior scholars and encouraged junior scholars to consider such collaborations when submitting to JMS says.

Instructions on how to submit to the different areas of JMS can be found online.

We would like to thank Professor Doh for an insightful and informative session.

Further Information

Share

How to publish in top Management journals

In the Department of Management’s second Meet the Editor session, attendees heard from four inspiring academic speakers on how to publish in prestigious journals and the key pitfalls to avoid.

Editors of the top journals are tasked with reviewing thousands of papers, so how can you ensure that yours makes it past initial review and has a higher chance of getting published?

At the second of the Department of Management’s Meet the Editor sessions – chaired by Dr Muthu De Silva, Director of Research – Dr Geoff Walters, Executive Dean, School of Business Economics and Informatics welcomed Dr Dermot Breslin (International Journal of Management and Essex Business School), Professor Martyna Sliwa (Management Learning and Essex Business School), Professor Savvas Papagiannidis (Technological Forecasting and Social Change and Newcastle University Business School) and Dr Mohammad Faisal Ahammad (British Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies and Leeds University Business School) to share their insight.

This session was very well attended by 75 scholars around the world.

Through this interactive session, a number of key considerations for authors were discussed:

Tailor your article to the journal and never resubmit to a different journal without revising substantially

It goes without saying that articles should be tailored for a specific journal, but all presenters were in agreement that a quick way to get your submission rejected is to make it obvious that it has been submitted elsewhere first. Speakers emphasised that even if authors are resubmitting a paper to a different journal, it is essential to ensure that the article is tailored for this resubmission, as it is obvious when this is not the case.

Understand the scope of your chosen journal

To make it less likely that you will need to resubmit your article, it is important to understand the scope of different journals. For example, does your chosen journal publish literature reviews? Does your article ‘fit’ with the type of content that the journal has published in the past? Does it offer a new perspective on these issues? Taking the time to effectively target and understand your chosen journal will lead to a more successful submission.

Address any issues raised by editors and reviewers

Dr Mohammad Faisal Ahammad shared some useful insights from his experience of having papers reviewed, accepted, revised, and rejected. He noted that taking the time to respond to reviewer comments in detail led to a much greater acceptance rate. Use this response as an opportunity to highlight the contribution made by your paper and take the time to address concerns raised by reviewers in a way that makes the process as easy as possible for them. He -using a few examples-, clearly outlined strategies to adopt to successfully address common comments made by reviewers (e.g. motivation, common method bias and endogeneity issues etc)

Support journals by becoming a reviewer

Several speakers commented on the value of becoming a reviewer as a way to support journals and gain insight into this process. Becoming a reviewer is often a stepping stone to membership of an editorial board, so it is well worth considering the commitment.

We would like to thank Dr Breslin, Professor Sliwa, Professor Papagiannidis and Dr Ahammad for their time during this highly informative session. All are welcome to join us for our upcoming Meet the Editor events:

Further Information

Share