Archives for the month of: February, 2013

By Debojyoti Das

I am currently in the Sundarbans, investigating local experiences of environmental change.

The sketches below were made by Mr Mukondo Gyan who is a poet, freelance insurance agent and writer from Doyapur village. His writings have appeared in the local Bengali press, and his poems are also published. These sketches were made in 2011 with toothbrushes and colours that he collected from the neighbouring forest. The sketches depict the destruction and the very nature of the cyclone that brought immense misery to the settlements in Doyapur. The area’s agricultural fields are barren and mostly saline. The production of rice, potato, cereals and chilies have declined after the cyclone. Although the tourism industry is booming on the island, it has brought new social and environmental problems.

 

By Sunil Amrith

Recent data from the World Bank suggests that global migrant remittances exceeded $400 billion in 2012. They are estimated to reach $534 billion by 2015. Remittances have shown “remarkable resilience” through the global financial crisis; they amount to around three times the total sum of development assistance. Though the United States remains the greatest source of migrant remittances in the world, the strongest growth is within Asia. India is the world’s largest recipient of migrant remittances, amounting to $70 billion annually: the greatest source of those remittances is the large population of Indian contract workers in the Middle East. Remittances from overseas amounted to 3.4 per cent of India’s GDP in 2011; in neighbouring Bangladesh, this figure is over 10 per cent.

I will write more in a separate post about migrant remittances in historical perspective. Is the growing importance of migrant remittances a novel symptom of globalization, or can we see parallels or even connections with an earlier history of Asian migration? My last book, Migration and Diaspora in Modern Asia, attempted to provide a narrative of that longer history.

Remittances are particularly relevant in the context of coastal regions of Asia that are particularly threatened by rising sea levels, more frequent flooding, and land subsidence. As Sam Knight pointed out in an important feature in the Financial Times a few years ago, while most policy discussions of climate change and migration see migration as an inevitable consequence of climate change—think of the spectre of “climate refugees”—the relationship can work the other way. In some instances, migration is “no longer an act of abandonment, but part of what allows people to stay.” The migration of some family members, and the remittances they send back, allows others to maintain their homes against drought or rising waters.

It would be short-sighted to separate a discussion of “climate migration” too clearly from a broader consideration of inter-regional movement around the Bay of Bengal, both in the past and in the present. The Asian Development Bank acknowledges that “migration flows associated with climate change” will use “existing migration corridors … already used by family or community members.”

By Sunil Amrith

In their incisive and exhaustively-researched book, Churning the Earth: The Making of Global India, Aseem Shrivastava and Ashish Kothari provide an alternative perspective on India’s headlong rush to economic growth since the liberalization of the 1990s. Without denying the very real benefits that economic expansion has brought to India’s rising middle classes, and while recognising the progress towards poverty reduction among some sections of the population, they examine the other side of the oft-reported tale of India’s success: the impoverishment and neglect of rural India, rising social and economic inequality, a veritable “land grab” by the state and powerful corporations at the expense of local people’s rights and livelihoods—and they focus on the environmental costs of the pursuit of growth.

In the parts of the book most directly relevant to the research of the Coastal Frontiers project, Shrivastava and Kothari’s account of how coastal regions are changing provides much food for thought. The expansion of aquaculture for shrimp farming since the 1980s has altered the ecological balance of coastal regions—changing levels of salinity, encroaching upon mangrove forests, undermining the livelihoods of local fishers. Mining, too, is no longer confined to the “charred coal landscapes of eastern India” or the “radioactive uranium belt of Jharkhand”—large swaths of the Orissa coast are being targeted for sand mining for thorium. Port construction proceeds apace, all the way down India’s eastern seaboard: from the  dozen new ports slated for construction along the Orissa coast to the Cuddalore-Nagapatrinam Petroleum Corridor proposed in Tamil Nadu. Churning the Earth charts the effects on the beaches of South Asia of the global trade in waste—the ship-breaking yard of Alang, Gujarat, is the world’s largest, followed closely by the facility in Chittagong, Bangladesh. The work is hazardous, the process is toxic; thousands depend on these yards for employment.

One of the key questions this project seeks to ask is whether a longer historical perspective might add something to our understanding of these changing land- and seascapes, and of the changing strategies that local people adapt—while many of these ecological shifts have accelerated since the 1980s, they have roots in colonial and post-colonial history, as Shrivastava and Kothari acknowledge at many points in the book.

 Churning the Earth is essential, sobering, reading. The picture the authors present is not wholly bleak, however: the second half of the book focuses on their vision for a “radical ecological democracy.”

There is a thought-provoking feature in the New Yorker on the effects of recent cyclones in the Sundarbans, featuring the superb photographs of Ismail Ferdous.

 

By Sunil Amrith

I have been working through the fascinating archives of the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich. Among the company reports and other miscellaneous items are many details about the company—which tells us something about history of steam power in South Asia, and about the Irrawaddy River itself.

The Company’s grand headquarters now house the Myanmar Port Authority. The building still dominates Yangon’s skyline; though it is unclear how long that will remain the case, given the construction boom that appears to be underway in the city.

The Irrawaddy Flotilla Company was formed in 1865, owned by the brothers Henderson, originally from the village of Pittenween in Fifeshire, Scotland. The family’s fortunes rose from the initial misfortune of George Henderson, shipwrecked while commanding a sailing vessel “trading to the near east.” He survived the ordeal, and installed himself in Italy, where he flourished in the marble trade to Britain—the Glasgow end of the business was handled by his three brothers. By the 1850s, the Hendersons had abandoned marble and moved into long-distance shipping: they owned a small fleet that sailed between Scotland, New York and Quebec; at the turn of the 1860s, they were at the “forefront” of the “emigrant trade” to New Zealand. On the return journey from New Zealand, the Hendersons’ vessels began to call at Rangoon, where they took on cargoes of rice and teak. Before long, the Burma rice trade proved so profitable that they abandoned the antipodean leg of the voyage altogether; around the same time, they purchased a small fleet of steam-powered river craft to profit from the Irrawaddy’s flourishing trade.

A promotional booklet of 1872 assured potential investors that “there is no trade to the east more capable of … continuous expansion than that of Burmah.” The Irrawaddy had “its banks studded with towns and villages, crowded with an active, industrious population to whom this river is the great highway.” Until the advent of steam, “the whole traffic on the river was conducted by native boats”—up to twenty-five thousand of them. Now steam power, “by its speed, regularity, and safety, is gradually superseding native craft”; all that was needed was a “sufficient supply of plant to monopolise, in great measure, the traffic.” For two decades, the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company imported its coal directly from Britain; from the 1890s, supplies began to arrive from the coal-fields of Bengal.

* Full references will appear in chapter 4 of my forthcoming book, Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and the Fortunes of Migrants (Harvard University Press, 2013)

Crossing Yangon River

 By Sunil Amrith

 

At Pansodan Jetty, I am ushered into the Manager’s office by two youths. An old man, longyi-clad, asks us to sign a ledger, and writes out painstakingly two tickets: to Dalah and back. The journey takes all of ten minutes. We exchange a few words in Tamil; “I am Tamil,” he says, “but born in Burma.” Out of historian’s habit, too ready to see locked drawers as archival stashes, I wonder what materials are contained in his office.

The rickety ferry that takes us across the river is at least thirty years old—quite possibly much older than that. Once they were run by the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company. Vendors of everything roam the decks. An old Muslim man operates a makeshift wheelchair attached to a bicycle. Young men hawk DVDs of the comedian Zargana—released from prison only in 2012—and of Aung San Suu Kyi’s speeches. Everything is as it was, yet things in Myanmar are completely different.

The ferry is full of commuters, but the container port hosts only a few ships. Surely that is set to change—Myanmar beckons to the world’s hungry investors.

The purpose of my trip is to see Dalah which, on the account of my nineteenth century sources, was a thriving shipyard. Already by 1890 Dalah, across the river from Rangoon, had developed into a thriving dry dock and repair station: “here also were situated Boiler Shops, Erecting Shops, Machine Shops, Carpenters Shops and all the other type of shops which go to make up a shipyard.”

Today it bears little trace of that history. It is an unremarkable place with a somewhat abandoned air to it. For a moment, I imagine making a tour of the Bay of Bengal’s once-great now-forgotten ports: Dalah and Nagapatnam and Masulipatnam. A project for another time, perhaps.