Together with European project MINDtheGEPs and a distinguished panel from Portugal, the EU institutions and the research community, we will deep dive into Portugal’s performance on equality, discuss what more the EU could do to deliver a gender balanced research system and consider how the gender equality implementation plans will be rolled out in Europe’s research and innovation framework.
The discussion on Wednesday 16th June will be divided in two sessions; the first, starting at 10:00 CEST, will examine the reasons behind Portugal’s success and how it could be replicated across Europe, with questions to representatives from the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Portuguese Government and the research community. The second session, starting at 11:35 CEST, will bring together established members of the research community to discuss how gender equality can be realised in practice through strategic interventions and implementation of gender equality plans. The event brings together the following speakers:
Session 1 on policy, moderated by Elizabeth Crossick, Head of EU Government Relations, RELX: – Rosa Monteiro, Secretary of State for Citizenship & Equality, Portugal – Ramona Strugariu, Member of European Parliament, Renew Europe – Lesia Radelicki, Member of Cabinet of the Equality Commissioner, Helena Dalli – Prof Analia Torres, Director CIEG, Centre of Gender Studies, Lisbon University – Federica Rosetta, Vice President Academic & Research Relations EU, Elsevier
Session 2 on policy in practice, moderated by Claudio Colaiacomo, Vice President Academic Relations, Elsevier: – Mina Stareva, Head of Sector Gender, DG Research & Innovation, European Commission – Prof Maria Chiara Carrozza, President CNR (National Research Council, Italy) – Prof Stefano Geuna, Rector Magnificus, Torino University, Italy – Anna Wahl, Vice President Gender Equality & Values, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology)Time
Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI) is currently
planning its programme of events for 2021-22. We welcome proposals from
researchers and students working in any discipline or field across the College.
We are very happy to work in collaboration with research centres and institutes
at Birkbeck or at other institutions, both in terms of exchanging ideas and
materials and in terms of sharing costs and logistics.
We encourage our Birkbeck colleagues to utilise the
facilities of Birkbeck Cinema to foreground new or rarely screened films and
other moving image works, and/or to contribute to contemporary debates around
academic research and its relationship to social, political and cultural
questions of the day.
In normal times, all of our events take place in Birkbeck
Cinema, typically on Friday evenings 6-9pm and Saturdays 10-5pm. Birkbeck
Cinema is an exceptional resource, now equipped to project the most up to date DCP
and other digital formats, as well as traditional formats such as 35mm and
16mm.
In the current circumstances, however, we cannot say for
sure when we will have full access to Birkbeck Cinema. For the autumn term,
we are therefore especially interested in proposals for events that could be
adapted, if necessary, to online presentation, with the possibility of streaming
films via our Screening Room. From January 2022, while we hope to be able to
operate from the Cinema in our usual fashion, we are aware that nothing is certain,
and so we will remain open to the possibility of adapting BIMI events to online
versions if this proves necessary.
If you would like to propose an idea for an event, please
complete this form and send it tobimi@bbk.ac.ukwith the subject heading “BIMI proposals 2021-22”.The
deadline for submission is Friday 25 June.
Michael Temple, Director, Birkbeck Institute for the Moving
Image, and Essay Film Festival; Matthew Barrington, BIMI Manager
Title of proposed event:
Names of proposers and department or School:
Description of event (no more than 250 words, please):
Screening material (including technical specifications if known):
Indicative budget (film materials, speakers, travel, etc. – BIMI can typically cover up to £200 per event):
Potential collaborators (from Birkbeck or other institutions):
If you’re starting a doctoral programme later this year, particularly if your institution is still facing COVID-19 restrictions, Ciara O’Brien has some advice.
First printed in nature magazine 6 May 2021. See here for original article
Ciara O’Brien working in the laboratory at Cranfield University, where she started her PhD programme amid COVID-19 lockdowns.Credit: Cranfield University
In September 2020, I started my PhD programme in plant science at Cranfield University, a postgraduate-only research institute in the United Kingdom. I struggled with many aspects of the transition from undergraduate to PhD study at the beginning — particularly with the added challenges of lockdown. With varying levels of restrictions still affecting many researchers, here are some of the things I learnt.
Manage your expectations when setting goals
I had grand expectations of what I would achieve in the first few months of my programme. I did manage to move from Ireland to the United Kingdom, and got myself set up at the laboratory — but I had also expected to have almost completed my first draft of a literature review, designed experiments and started my own lab work.Sign up for tips and tools to help you work smarter in the new normal
Those ideas were swiftly torpedoed. During month one, I did almost no science. I moved to a new country, which meant finding accommodation without viewings and opening a bank account without a credit history. This is normally difficult enough, but I couldn’t visit banks in person and relied on automated systems. Thankfully, I moved before Brexit and didn’t have to quarantine — but simple steps still took longer because of lockdown. I spent hours on the phone with the university’s information-technology department, trying to acquire and set up a work laptop. Once I got it, I did an online safety-training course (only to find I had to redo it because my browser crashed and didn’t save my progress) and filled out form after form to get my student number, student finance stipend and lab-access credentials.
Having not achieved anything resembling PhD research, I was terrified of letting my supervisors down right at the start. But when I spoke to them about my (minimal) progress in reading papers and designing experiments, they had anticipated that these tasks would take a lot of time and reminded me that although filling out every form under the sun might not feel like science, it is work.
Volunteering to help others helps you in the long run
Most PhD students will start at a university that is new to them, which means meeting a new set of supervisors, technicians, professors, administrative staff and more. Once you do get to know these people, it’s a lot easier to know who to ask for what.
But it’s more difficult to go through the ‘getting to know you’ process online. Volunteering to help out with ‘dirty’ jobs helped me to get to know people and brought me into the lab to meet others face-to-face. I also garnered favour among others in my team. I spent a week defrosting freezers, and another week moving sacks of potatoes from one room to another. I can’t count how many hours I spent cleaning our lab equipment that had been in storage! But now, I know nearly all the technicians in my department — so asking for help or guidance is less daunting.
This also gave me a sense of ‘family’. Lockdown meant that numbers in the lab were kept to a minimum, so I didn’t meet many people as ‘organically’ as others might have in normal circumstances. I also couldn’t travel home without putting my family at risk. Christmas would have been unbearable if not for the people I met in my first few months, and now we all have a support network.
Take ownership of your project
Just before I started my programme, my supervisor sent me the grant application she had used to get funding for my project. At first, I stuck to it like scripture, focusing mostly on the references used in the application rather than getting a feel for the field in general. Even when some parts of the project didn’t fit with the others, or I found gaps in the literature that I could and wanted to address, I didn’t have the confidence to claim ownership of my project.
But as I started to design experiments and develop hypotheses, I wanted to delve deeper into some aspects of the project and scrap others. Some of the proposed experiments were just not attainable with the allotted time and resources, and once I explained why to my supervisors, they were really supportive of my changes. One of the initial goals of my project was comparing harvest times of fruit, despite early- and late-harvested fruit being used for completely different purposes. My corporate sponsor, Orchard House Foods, doesn’t work with one of these harvests, so I would have had to source options from different farms just to do a study that has already been done several times. After three months, I finally asked whether it was really worth investigating this, giving my reasons, and we scrapped it.
Even though I didn’t design my PhD project from scratch, taking ownership has allowed me to ‘pitch’ changes to both academics and industry partners and has been one of the most valuable skills I’ve developed so far.
Your style does not have to match your supervisor’s style
My two main supervisors are food scientists Mari Carmen Alamar and Natalia Falagán. Mari Carmen is known for running around the lab and yelling everything, so you can always hear her coming. Natalia is calm and collected, keeping everything scheduled. If you set her lab coat on fire, she’d probably just take it off and get the appropriate extinguisher.Collection: the PhD
At first, I tried to mimic their styles as closely as I could, switching to match whoever was working with me at the time. I tried making lists and timetables in Natalia’s style, but was adjusting the times so often that it was more complicated than winging it. If Mari Carmen ran, I ran after her — and couldn’t last long because of my short legs. I needed more coffee than my heart could handle to match her intensity. This turned out to be a waste of energy spent trying to be someone else, when what I needed to do was accept my own working style. I still run, but only on rare occasions, and my to-do list is written on the back of my hand rather than scheduled in a diary. If you see someone with a working style that you like, adapt yours to include it. But, just because someone is your supervisor, that doesn’t mean you should model everything you do on the basis of how they do it.
Manage your expectations of yourself
When I first started my programme, I tried to work all day, every day — including weekends — thinking that’s what was expected of me. From hearing presentations of other PhD students and seeing the work that goes into publishing a manuscript in a journal, I thought the only way I could keep up with people ‘smarter’ than me was to outwork them. Of course it wasn’t, but I was comparing myself with an ideal that doesn’t exist. This was made worse by not having much contact with people further along on their PhD journeys, because I was working mostly from home. Putting this pressure on myself was emotionally and physically exhausting, so, when I was getting constructive feedback, I took it as criticism instead of help. I expected myself to do things perfectly the first time. I didn’t take breaks when I needed them, and ended up having to take longer ones later. Admitting to yourself, and your supervisors, when things are overwhelming early on will end up saving you time and sleep.
Always enjoy the small achievements
There are a lot of setbacks in a PhD programme, but there are just as many achievements. A presentation went well, someone complimented your diagram, you finished an hour early: these are all things worth celebrating as much as losing the post-it note you were writing on is worth stressing about.
I’m someone who worries about the little things — as much as I try not to — so making sure I am as vocal and celebratory over small achievements is important for my balance. Papers and grants are not the only things worth congratulating other people for, too. After finishing my first draft of a literature review (in month seven), I took a full day off to eat pizza and watch daytime television. And I will forever be keeping a pint of ice cream on hand to celebrate finishing that analysis or getting through a progress review.doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01233-2
This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged.
Peer support, finding a place within academia, staying up to date with the latest research, communicating research to wider audiences and navigating life after PhD.Ema Talam andJon Fairburn outline five ways in which social media, and in particular Twitter, can make all the difference to PhD research at a time when regular academic life has been severely disrupted.
Doing a PhD is hard: lack of work-life balance, uncertainty about the future, diminishing satisfaction with the PhD programme over time, isolation, harassment and discrimination are all too common experiences. COVID-19 has only exacerbated these challenges.
Whilst by no means a panacea, at a time when undertaking a PhD is even more of a fragmented and disjointed experience, social media provides an important space for connection. We – a PhD student and an experienced researcher with over 25 years of experience in academia – put forward the five following reasons why PhD researchers at any stage of the process can benefit from engaging with academic social media and why it is more important now than before COVID-19 pandemic.
Peer Support
Let’s start with the peer support. With universities in lockdown and many PhD students working from home, the informal support that comes from working as part of a research community has diminished. Despite its sometimes hostile reputation, peer support is strongly present on Twitter. Readers new to academic Twitter might consider following general academic hashtags, such as #AcademicTwitter, #AcademicChatter and #AcademicMentalHealth, or specifically PhD centred discussions on #phdchat and #virtualnotviral. Whilst a hashtag is not a peer support network, in difficult times they provide pathways to resources and opportunities to meet likeminded people that can make all the difference.
You may even find your peer group is larger than you anticipated. The sudden shift to remote teaching and learning early last year, placed experienced professors and PhD researches running their first classes from all fields in the same position of learning to teach remotely for the first time. The hashtags above as well as being links to a wider research community have also been an invaluable resource for teaching tips and tricks, learning resources and even free training. Do not be afraid to ask questions related to teaching or any aspect of academic life.
Whilst a hashtag is not a peer support network, in difficult times they provide pathways to resources and opportunities to meet likeminded people that can make all the difference.
Finally, Twitter can also be used as a tool for co-ordinating and engaging with existing PhD communities, for instance through organising synchronous and a-synchronous events, such as remote writing retreats.
Navigating your academic discipline(s)
In a similar way hashtags can also be used to find academic communities, for economists #econtwitter is a good place to start as is RePEc’s list of economists on twitter. Learned societies and their social media accounts, e.g. in our fields the Royal Economic Society or Regional Studies Association, also provide useful points for finding the latest news from a particular discipline and often provide tailored advice for how certain disciplines approach social media.
For better or worse, social media is a surveillance network. By following academics whose work you are interested in, you can not only directly engage with them, but by simply following you can develop a sense of the research, networks and events they are interested in. These can help you orient your research towards academic communities and projects that may not be represented within your own institution.
While approaching people at conferences can be intimidating, it is almost impossible on Zoom events due to lack of time dedicated for informal networking or even any breaks at all
Social media can also be a source of inspiration for looking beyond your immediate discipline. The shift to digital as a result of the lockdown, has considerably lowered barriers to attending conferences and seminars. These events are regularly advertised via social media and are a great opportunity for you to attend new areas of research and expose yourself to new ideas and methods that can benefit your PhD.
While approaching people at conferences can be intimidating, it is almost impossible on Zoom events due to lack of time dedicated for informal networking or even any breaks at all. Fortunately, the back channel provided by social media, such as Twitter, can provide a means of keeping the conversation going. Look out for event hashtags, which can be used to preview your work, or just to signal your presence and highlight what you found interesting. Finally, in digital environments where genuine engagement can often be minimal, a considered question or engagement is invaluable and can even lead to future collaboration.
Keeping up to date with the latest research
Not all academic dialogue resides in published academic papers. Many academics post and discuss newly published papers on Twitter. Social media such as twitter, are also central to sharing non-standard research outputs like blogposts, infographics, or even datasets. As COVID-19 has demonstrated much influential research has circulated via social media in the form of preprints, long before final publication. These can all be very useful for PhD students to track new developments in their fields of study.
Communicating your research to wider audiences
COVID-19 has also demonstrated the importance of social media as part of the public sphere and having a profile has become increasingly important for making your work visible to important stakeholders, the media and the general public. Established organisations, such as NGOs, or even your university, are likely to have significant audiences on social media and present opportunities to share your research with non-academic audiences.
This could involve simply tagging potential interested stakeholders in posts or taking part in more structured engagements. Simply being on social media does not guarantee public engagement, but it is a platform that allows you to connect to potential research users, which can be invaluable at a time when social contact of any type is minimal.
Life after PhD
Institutions and academics often share information about the job openings on Twitter. Following academics in your field of study can ensure that you have information about new job openings. Twitter makes it easy for information about job openings to be shared – your network can either tag you in posts about job openings or send a direct message. By building your social networks around your research interests, you are more likely to find relevant information about job openings in the field(s) of interest, whether in or outside of the academia. Many government agencies, firms and universities also have their professional profiles on LinkedIn, where they share information about new job opportunities. Additionally, on LinkedIn, you can easily indicate your openness to work or share your CV should you wish to. Both platforms can be used to seek for advice regarding job applications and help write stronger applications.
PhD students (and their supervisors) are sometimes sceptical about the use of social media and the time that will be spent on social media. Engaging with academic social media does not have to involve huge time investments – it can involve only several minutes per day and directly depends on what you want to get out of it. We would argue the benefits of using academic social media far outweigh the costs.
Note: This article gives the views of the authors, and not the position of the Impact of Social Science blog, nor of the London School of Economics. Please review our Comments Policy if you have any concerns on posting a comment below.
Image Credit: Adapted from Jon Tyson, via Unsplash.
About the author
Ema Talam
Ema Talam is a final year PhD in Economics student at Staffordshire University. She is interested in the topics of firm-level productivity, innovation and exporting, as well as innovation policies. Follow Ema on Twitter on @ematalam.
Jon Fairburn
Jon Fairburn is Professor of Sustainable Development at Staffordshire University. He teaches on the MSc Digital Marketing Management amongst other courses. Follow him on Twitter @ProfJonFairburn.
The Essay Film Festival returns 25 March to 3 April for its 2021 edition, which this year will be held entirely online. The Essay Film Festival is supported by AHRC funded CHASE Doctoral Training Partnership.
How will the festival work online?
All the films will be free and open to anyone in the UK. To watch
the films, visit our online screening room, where you will be able to view all
the films at a time that suits you. The screening room does not require any
sign-ups or downloads. While most of this material will be made available for
the entire festival window (25 March to 3 April), one or two items will be up
for a more limited period, so you should check the window of availability for
each film.
What about live events?
Our programme of live events – open to audiences globally –
includes artists’ and curators’ talks, conversations with filmmakers and
discussions with critics and researchers. These will take place online, via a
platform called Collaborate, which is very simple to use. Book your place on
our website (http://www.essayfilmfestival.com),
and we will send you a link to join us on the day: again, you do not need to
create an account or download any software.
What is in the
programme this year?
For us the
essay film is a critical intervention in the world, combining a passion for investigating
reality and for asking tough questions about society with an open, inventive
and even playful approach to film language and forms of representation.
This year’s
programme reflects that dynamic ambition for the essay film, with a wide range
of contemporary and archival works from different parts of the world,
accompanied by live talks and conversations featuring artists and researchers.
Madeleine
Hunt-Ehrlich will
give a talk about her forthcoming project on Suzanne Césaire, alongside a
selection of her short films exploring alternative voices and narratives from
African-American history.
Cauleen Smith will be joining us to discuss a programme of her experimental
works reflecting her longstanding interest in Afro-futurism and jazz,
especially Alice Coltrane and Sun Ra.
Two
programmes of short films by Kevin Jerome Everson focus on themes of
labour and place, which the artist will further develop in an illustrated talk
and conversation.
From the Asian Film Archive we
share Monographs, a series of video essays responding to the
uncertainties of the pandemic from ten contemporary Asian artists, some of whom
will be speaking at the festival with critic and essayist Kevin B. Lee.
John Gianvito
will be in conversation about his latest film, Her Socialist Smile, an
historical essay about Helen Keller that foregrounds her radical politics and
commitment to social justice.
Nuria Giménez’s
My Mexican Bretzel uses found footage and literary invention to play
with the conventions of film portraiture and highlight the invisibility of
women’s histories – themes that the artist will discuss in a live conversation.
An extended programme around the
work of Jenny Brady features three of her own films and three films
curated by the artist, alongside a talk about her current research into musical
performance and the sonic practice of Alvin Lucier.
Our archival section showcases films by Med Hondo and Sidney
Sokhona, both representing critically the lives of African workers in
France in the 1970s; writer Assia Djebar’s filmic reinterpretation of colonial
travelogues and newsreels shot in Algeria; and the collaborative films of Yugantar,
India’s first feminist film collective.
This year’s programme closes with a study day devoted to
Brazilian filmmaker Eduardo Coutinho, specifically his films Man
Marked for Death, Last Conversations and the unfinished A Day in
Life.
Come and join us!
On behalf of
the Essay Film Festival: Matthew Barrington, Lauren Collee, Kieron Corless,
Catherine Grant, Ricardo Matos Cabo, Janet McCabe, Raquel Morais, Laura Mulvey,
Michael Temple
Every year, the Cumberland Lodge Scholarships gives 10 doctoral students the opportunity to spend two years involved in our work; bringing people together, from different backgrounds, ages and perspectives, to address the causes and effects of social division and work towards more open and inclusive societies.
Scholars have the chance to network with senior figures in public life and to participate in, or help to lead discussions with people of all ages, backgrounds and perspectives that ultimately inform recommendations for practical action and policy change. Scholars also have opportunities to take part in Programme topics outside their own academic disciplines. In doing so, they will gain experience in: working collaboratively; engaging in cross-disciplinary discussion; public engagement and facilitation at events; networking; and writing for a range of different audiences.
The Scholarships fit around the demands of doctoral
research. The Scholarships are open to students of any age who are enrolled on
a doctoral programme within the UK.
There is no contribution towards tuition or maintenance costs. Scholars are, however, provided with meals, accommodation and standard economy return travel to Lodge events, amongst priority attendance at other digital events. A Personal Development Grant of up to £300 is also accessible.
Applicants must:
Have at least two years left to complete their PhD
Be studying at a UK university
Provide a CV and covering letter demonstrating a commitment to working for ‘the betterment of society’ through their academic research and/or other activities.
All types of doctoral candidates are eligible to apply,
including full-time, part-time and those on non-traditional pathways and
professional doctorate programmes. Since 2014, a total of 57 students have
enjoyed, and are currently enjoying, the benefits of this programme.
Potential Scholars are welcome to apply between 1 March 2021 – 9 April 2021. For more information about Cumberland Lodge and the Scholarship scheme, please visit their website.
My name is
Nerges Azizi and I recently started the MPhil in Law at Birkbeck, University of
London. My research addresses ways of resisting the European border regime,
with a particular focus on the role of strategic litigation. I chose this topic
because of the experiences I have had working with refugees as a translator and
interpreter. In the course of that work, the law again and again surfaced as an
obstacle and an instrument of power designed to regulate their existence,
behaviour and expectations. Despite the disciplinary and oppressive function of
the law, the people who I was working with were forced to appeal to the law in
order to receive protection. This provoked me to question whether there could
be alternative uses of the law, ones less geared towards regulating and disciplining
the lives of refugees, towards ones that hold states accountable. During my
preliminary research, I came across strategic litigation, which describes the
tactical use of legal tools to hold states accountable for their human rights
obligations.
At present, I
am sceptical about the prospects of this tool, however, I am looking forward to
examine all the ambivalences and difficulties of engaging with the law. I am
particularly interested in what the resort to legal means might be able to
reveal about the ways in which the European border regime is constituted and
contested. My geographical focus is the Mediterranean Sea, which presently has
been transformed into a site of death and racial violence by European policy
makers and border guards. I aim to place this sphere into a longer historical
perspective, in which the sea was not partitioned into north and south, east
and west – nor was it necessarily functioning as a border – rather, it might
have worked as a space of encounter, connection or a bridge. At the same time,
I will be attentive to the colonial, imperial and racial violence shaping the
history of its human crossings. Tracing histories of the Mediterranean, as well
as conceptually departing from the sea, hopefully allows me to imagine another
function for it and opens the possibility of an alternative future. I am very
excited to work on the project and look forward to the writing that will emerge
from it.
When applying
for the PhD, considering who my supervisors would be, and who else would be
working at the department and at the school where I would be based, was of high
importance to me. This is because I consider my environment to shape me
intellectually; we learn from the people around us. A PhD is a long project and
is potentially accompanied with some anxieties and self-doubt, therefore
working with supervisors whose work I am familiar with and respect ensures that
I can trust that my research will be guided in the right direction. Of course,
having the financial stability of a scholarship is indispensable and crucial to
be able to concentrate on researching and writing. This is particularly so for
students of working class background and ethnic minorities. I would recommend
everyone to apply to existing scholarship opportunities.
Birkbeck is offering a number of fully funded Diversity100 PhD studentships which actively address under-representation at the highest level of research, and encourage Black and Minority Ethnic students to consider academic research in all disciplines.
The call for Diversity100 PhD studentship applications is open until Monday 10 May. You can find further details about these studentship opportunities here including how to apply and about briefing sessions for prospective applicants where you can hear about the application process and what it is like to be a doctoral researcher at Birkbeck.
Debi Lewinson Roberts
In the video below we hear from Debi Lewinson Roberts who was awarded a Diversity100 PhD studentship and began her doctoral research in Autumn 2020. Debi speaks on the subject of bereavement, her family’s influence on her education and why she chose Birkbeck.
You may be interested in the following announcement from the National Archives which includes information about online ‘Introduction to Archival Research’ sessions.
The National Archives holds one of the largest collections in the world, containing over 11 million historical government and public records. From Domesday Book to the Leveson Enquiry, our records offer students a myriad of untapped research opportunities across a wide range of time periods and disciplines.
With so many options, however, getting started in the archives can be a daunting prospect. Many students have questions which they are too afraid to ask. How will I know where to go? What do I need to bring with me? How do I find records for my research? How do I order documents? Do I need to use gloves? How can I be sure I’m not wasting my time?
This introduction day will explain how to get started with archival research, the importance of knowing the history and structure of a collection to navigate the records, and how to make the most of your time on site.
Our upcoming events
Our next ‘Introduction to Archival Research’ sessions will be held entirely online on the following dates:
These sessions are are aimed at third year undergraduate and postgraduate students. Registration this year will be at a reduced rate of £5. While this workshop will be entirely presented online, we hope that students will be able to join us back at Kew for our Skills and Methodology workshops, which will be held in June 2021.
The Birkbeck Students’ Union Women’s Network, in partnership with the SU Environment Society, the Birkbeck Unison Environmental Representative and the Birkbeck UCU Environmental Officer, is organising a symposium to hear from women researchers on the climate crisis, to be held at Birkbeck in early 2021.
Proposals
for papers from researchers in any discipline are encouraged – we want to hear
about the innovative and unique ways you can contribute to this discussion,
especially those who are not traditionally given space in discussions about the
environment but have meaningful contributions to make.
Topics
To that end, scholars are invited to submit papers on any subject relating to the climate crisis, with a focus on proactive solutions.
Topics
may include but are not limited to:
Feminism/gender
& the climate crisis
Intersectional
environmentalism
Politics
& the climate crisis
Race
& the climate crisis
Climate
change & the law
Media/journalism
& the climate crisis
LGBTQIA+
issues & the climate crisis
Technological
approaches to the climate crisis
Ethical
investments
Neoliberalism & the
climate crisis
Environmental activism
Length:
Individual paper abstracts should be no longer than 500 words. Papers which
require the distribution of pre-prepared materials, such as drafts, videos,
podcasts, posters, etc, will also be accepted.
